Susan Schriebman and Ann Hanlon have
put together a survey that aims to redress the current lack of a "concerted effort to gather information about the perceived value of tool development, not only as a scholarly activity, but in relation to the tenure and promotion process, as well as for the advancement of the field of digital humanities itself."
This must be the meme of the month, as
Bill Turkel just this week
unveiled plans to co-author with
Alan MacEachern a "book to teach practicing historians how to use programming to augment their ability to do research online."
Anyway, I'd encourage everybody who's ever built a digital tool for a humanities function (or who is thinking about it) to
take the survey and pester Bill to finish the book.